A 39-year-old male presented to the clinic with a 5-month history of a slow growing, solitary lump on the medial arch of his left foot. He had no inciting event or history of trauma. Initially, the nodule was not painful, but now the patient has pain while wearing certain shoes and with prolonged walking or standing. When off the nodule, he has no pain.
Clinical assessment revealed a spongy mass on his plantar left arch consistent with a fibroma. X-rays were unremarkable. An ultrasound was performed utilizing a linear array 12 megahertz probe at 1 cm depth and focus at the level of the lesion. Longitudinal and transverse images were obtained. Sonographic appearance of a typical fibroma includes a discrete, hypoechoic or hyperechoic fusiform nodular thickening of the plantar fascia (Figure 1). The patient’s ultrasound, however, revealed compartments within the nodule (Figure 2). The nodule’s appearance raised concern for a fibrosarcoma, which will present sonographically with compartments and calcification with posterior acoustic shadowing.1 All of these signs were present on our ultrasound examination. We ordered an MRI to further assess this lesion and requested the opinion of a musculokeletal radiologist. MRI revealed that this was indeed an atypical plantar fibroma, but it was not consistent with a fibrosarcoma. The patient was informed and opted for monthly assessments and possible biopsy if the lesion changed in any way.
The case brings up several points in regard to diagnostic ultrasound. First, as discussed in the article that was spotlighted in the last blog post, soft tissue masses are assessed well sonographically. Not only can the size be assessed, but the architecture, adjacent structures the mass encroaches, and tissue consistency, such as calcification, can also be determined. Second, vascularity can be assessed with color Doppler or power Doppler. This can be valuable in regard to diagnosis, but it is also good to know if you are aspirating, injecting, or planning surgery. Third, follow-up assessment to note any changes in suspicious masses is more precise. Changes in size, tissue quality, architecture, or inflammatory changes can be monitored.Coral Bay Splash cheap
1. Hoffman D, Bianchi S. Sonographic evaluation of plantar hindfoot and midfoot pain. Ultrasound Med. 2013;32:1271-1284.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.